Internal ReflectionsThe image below is a comparison of
two cameras using identical sensor types. One of the cameras has a
KAF-3200ME with a "Sealed AR Coated Glass" cover slip installed. The second camera
has a KAF-3200ME with a “Clear Taped Glass" cover slip which was removed during
installation into the camera.
Image Information
·
Cover Slip Sensor: Grade 2
·
Non-Cover Slip Sensor: Engineering Grade
·
Image Exposure: 60 seconds
·
Filters used: None
·
Object: Scheat
{Beta Pegasi}
·
Telescope: Takahashi
FSQ106N at f/5
·
Focuser: DF-2
·
Software: Maxim DL
4.03
Please note the field rotation which occurred when the cameras were switched
The effect of the cover slip is
clearly seen as an expanding cross pattern with multiple reflections
extending left and right of the star. Although there is a glow around
the bright, saturated star in the right image, there is no hint of
these reflections.

A sensor's QE is lower when used with any cover slip
Along with the potential of internal reflections discussed above, there is
another reason to consider using a digital imaging system that does not
employ a permanent sensor cover slip: a sensor's QE is lower when a cover
slip is used (up to nearly 8% lower). The actual loss is dependant upon
the cover slip's material but ANY digital imaging system using a sensor
with a cover slip will suffer QE losses that an identical imaging system
without a cover slip will not.